[1] Le Gallo, M., et al. A 64-core mixed-signal in-memory compute chip based on phase-change memory for deep neural network inference. Nature Electronics 6, 680-693 (2023). doi: 10.1038/s41928-023-01010-1
[2] Li, X. K., et al. High-efficiency reinforcement learning with hybrid architecture photonic integrated circuit. Nature Communications 15, 1044 (2024). doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45305-z
[3] Sun, S. M., et al. Integrated optical frequency division for microwave and mmwave generation. Nature 627, 540-545 (2024). doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07057-0
[4] Keshavarz, R., et al. Programmable circuits for analog matrix computations. Nature Communications 16, 8514 (2025). doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63486-z
[5] Liu, Y., et al. A photonic integrated circuit-based erbium-doped amplifier. Science 376, 1309-1313 (2022). doi: 10.1126/science.abo2631
[6] Shi, Z. J., et al. Flat-panel laser displays through large-scale photonic integrated circuits. Nature 644, 652-659 (2025). doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09107-7
[7] Huang, Y., et al. A skin-integrated multimodal haptic interface for immersive tactile feedback. Nature Electronics 6, 1020-1031 (2023).
[8] Yuvaraja, S., et al. Three-dimensional integrated hybrid complementary circuits for large-area electronics. Nature Electronics 8, 969-980 (2025). doi: 10.1038/s41928-025-01469-0
[9] Lukashchuk, A., et al. Photonic-electronic integrated circuit-based coherent lidar engine. Nature Communications 15, 3134 (2024). doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47478-z
[10] El Helou, C., et al. Mechanical integrated circuit materials. Nature 608, 699-703 (2022). doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05004-5
[11] Wang, Y. B., et al. Photonic-circuit-integrated titanium: sapphire laser. Nature Photonics 17, 338-345 (2023). doi: 10.1038/s41566-022-01144-2
[12] Zhong, D. L., et al. High-speed and large-scale intrinsically stretchable integrated circuits. Nature 627, 313-320 (2024). doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07096-7
[13] Zhang, B. B., et al. A three-dimensional liquid diode for soft, integrated permeable electronics. Nature 628, 84-92 (2024). doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07161-1
[14] Yang, Y. X., et al. A non-printed integrated-circuit textile for wireless theranostics. Nature communications 12, 4876 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25075-8
[15] Moore, G. E. et al. Progress in digital integrated electronics. Technical Digest 1975. International Electron Devices Meeting. IEEE, 1975, 11-13.
[16] Wei, Y. Y. Theory and Application of Advanced Lithography for VLSI (Science Press, 2016).
[17] Wei, Y. Y. et al. Computational Lithography and Layout Optimization. (Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2021), 107-123.
[18] Basu, P., et al. Advancements in lithography techniques and emerging molecular strategies for nanostructure fabrication. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, 3027 (2025). doi: 10.3390/ijms26073027
[19] Rayleigh, L. XXXI. Investigations in optics, with special reference to the spectroscope. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 8, 261-274 (1879).
[20] Shchegrov, A. et al. On product overlay metrology challenges in advanced nodes. Proceedings of SPIE 11325, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIV. San Jose, CA, USA: SPIE, 2020.
[21] Levinson, H. J. & Brunner, T. A. Current challenges and opportunities for EUV lithography. Proceedings of SPIE 10809, International Conference on Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2018.
[22] Brainard, R. L. et al. Shot noise, LER, and quantum efficiency of EUV photoresists. Proceedings of SPIE 5374, Emerging Lithographic Technologies VIII. Santa Clara, CA, USA: SPIE, 2004.
[23] Mack, C. A. Stochastic limitations to EUV lithography. Proceedings of the 2018 International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Application (VLSITSA). Hsinchu, China: IEEE, 2018.
[24] De Bisschop, P. Stochastic effects in EUV lithography: random, local CD variability, and printing failures. Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, Materials, and Metrology 16, 041013 (2017). doi: 10.1117/1.jmm.16.4.041013
[25] Fujimura, A., Choi, Y. & Shendre, A. Curvilinear masks overview: manufacturable mask shapes are more reliably manufacturable. Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 23, 041502 (2024). doi: 10.1117/1.jmm.23.4.041502
[26] Pang, L. Y. & Fujimura, A. Why the mask world is moving to curvilinear. Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 23, 041503 (2024).
[27] Spence, C. et al. Manufacturing challenges for curvilinear masks. Proceedings of SPIE 10451, Photomask Technology 2017. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2017.
[28] Ai, F., Su, X. J. & Wei, Y. Y. Research progress of inverse lithography technology. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology 47, 22-34 (2025).
[29] Pang, L. Y. Inverse lithography technology: 30 years from concept to practical, full-chip reality. Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 20, 030901 (2021). doi: 10.1117/1.jmm.20.3.030901
[30] Yang, Y. X. , et al. Advancements and challenges in inverse lithography technology: a review of artificial intelligence-based approaches. Light: Science & Applications 14, 250 (2025).
[31] Kim, B. G. et al. Trade-off between inverse lithography mask complexity and lithographic performance. Proceedings of SPIE 7379, Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology XVI. Yokohama, Japan: SPIE, 2009.
[32] Russell, E. ILT and curvilinear designs for advanced memory nodes. (2020). at https://www.ebeam.org/docs/ilt-curvilinear-maskdesigns-for-advanced-memory.pdf URL.
[33] Guo, V. W. et al. Lithographic benefits and mask manufacturability study of curvilinear masks. Proceedings of SPIE 10810, Photomask Technology 2018. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2018.
[34] Moon, J. et al. Curvilinear OPC and mask data prep for high-NA lithography. Proceedings of SPIE 13655, Photomask Japan 2025: XXXI Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology. Yokohama, Japan: SPIE, 2025.
[35] Choi, Y. , Fujimura, A. & Shendre, A. Curvilinear masks: an overview. Proceedings of SPIE 11855, Photomask Technology 2021. SPIE, 2021.
[36] Pang, L. Y. et al. Study of mask and wafer co-design that utilizes a new extreme SIMD approach to computing in memory manufacturing: full-chip curvilinear ILT in a day. Proceedings of SPIE 11148, Photomask Technology 2019. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2019.
[37] Shendre, A. et al. You don’t need 1nm contours for curvilinear shapes: pixel-based computing is the answer. Proceedings of SPIE 12293, Photomask Technology 2022. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2022.
[38] Pang, L. L. et al. Curvilinear masks: motivations and metrology. Proceedings of SPIE 13216, Photomask Technology 2024. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2024.
[39] Kim, R. H. Curvilinear Technology: A Game Changer for the Logic Technology Roadmap. Semiconductor Digest, 23-27 (2025).
[40] Bork, I. et al. MRC for curvilinear mask shapes. Proceedings of SPIE 11518, Photomask Technology 2020. SPIE, 2020.
[41] Matsumoto, H. et al. Multi-beam mask writer MBM-1000 and its application field. Proceedings of SPIE 9984, Photomask Japan 2016: XXIII Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology. Yokohama, Japan: SPIE, 2016.
[42] Drissi, Y. et al. Improving silicon-photonics inverse-design printability by leveraging SEM contours for advanced optical proximity correction techniques. Proceedings of SPIE 12012, Advanced Fabrication Technologies for Micro/Nano Optics and Photonics XV. San Francisco, CA, USA: SPIE, 2022.
[43] Zhang, Y. et al. Curvilinear OPC Mask synthesis flow. Proceedings of SPIE 12751, Photomask Technology 2023. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2023.
[44] Pang, L. et al. Model-based MPC Enables Curvilinear ILT using Either VSB or Multi-Beam Mask Writers. Proceedings of SPIE 10454, Photomask Japan 2017: XXIV Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology. Yokohama, Japan: SPIE, 2017.
[45] Dounde, A. et al. A study of curvilinear routing in IN5 standard cells: challenges and opportunities (Poster Presentation). Proceedings of SPIE 11148, Photomask Technology 2019. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2019.
[46] Treska, F. et al. EUV single patterning validation of curvilinear routing. Proceedings of SPIE 12494, Optical and EUV Nanolithography XXXVI. San Jose, CA, USA: SPIE, 2023.
[47] Kim, R. H., et al. Curvilinear standard cell design for semiconductor manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 37, 152-159 (2024). doi: 10.1109/TSM.2024.3362900
[48] Kim, R. H. et al. Manufacturing-friendly curvilinear standard cell design. Proceedings of SPIE 12954, DTCO and Computational Patterning III. San Jose, CA, USA: SPIE, 2024.
[49] Saleh, B. E. A. & Sayegh, S. I. Reduction of errors of microphotographic reproductions by optimal corrections of original masks. Optical Engineering 20, 205781 (1981). doi: 10.1117/12.7972810
[50] Pang, L. Y et al. Validation of inverse lithography technology (ILT) and its adaptive SRAF at advanced technology nodes. Proceedings of SPIE 6924, Optical Microlithography XXI. San Jose, CA, USA: SPIE, 2008.
[51] Xiao, G. M. et al. Affordable and process window increasing full chip ILT masks. Proceedings of SPIE 7823, Photomask Technology 2010. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2010.
[52] Pang, L. Y. et al. Optimization from design rules, source and mask, to full chip with a single computational lithography framework: level-set-methods-based inverse lithography technology (ILT). Proceedings of SPIE 7640, Optical Microlithography XXIII. San Jose, CA, USA: SPIE, 2010.
[53] Cheng, W. H. et al. Fabrication of defect-free full-field pixelated phase mask. Proceedings of SPIE 6924, Optical Microlithography XXI. San Jose, CA, USA: SPIE, 2008.
[54] Ma, X. & Arce, G. R. Generalized inverse lithography methods for phase-shifting mask design. Optics Express 15, 15066-15079 (2007). doi: 10.1364/oe.15.015066
[55] Ma, X. & Arce, G. Binary mask optimization for inverse lithography with partially coherent illumination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 25, 2960-2970 (2008). doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.25.002960
[56] Shen, Y. J., Wong, N. & Lam, E. Y. Level-set-based inverse lithography for photomask synthesis. Optics Express 17, 23690-23701 (2009). doi: 10.1364/OE.17.023690
[57] Lv, W., Xia, Q. & Liu, S. Y. Mask-filtering-based inverse lithography. Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS 12, 043003 (2013). doi: 10.1117/12.2011469
[58] Lv, W., et al. Level-set-based inverse lithography for mask synthesis using the conjugate gradient and an optimal time step. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B 31, 041605 (2013). doi: 10.1116/1.4813781
[59] Lv, W., et al. Cascadic multigrid algorithm for robust inverse mask synthesis in optical lithography. Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS 13, 023003 (2014). doi: 10.1117/1.JMM.13.2.023003
[60] Shen, Y. J., et al. Robust level-set-based inverse lithography. Optics Express 19, 5511-5521 (2011). doi: 10.1364/OE.19.005511
[61] Shen, Y. J. Level-set based mask synthesis with a vector imaging model. Optics Express 25, 21775-21785 (2017). doi: 10.1364/OE.25.021775
[62] Shen, Y. J., Peng, F. & Zhang, Z. R. Efficient optical proximity correction based on semi-implicit additive operator splitting. Optics Express 27, 1520-1528 (2019). doi: 10.1364/OE.27.001520
[63] Shen, Y. J., Zhou, Y. Z. & Zhang, Z. R. Fast implicit active contour model for inverse lithography. Optics Express 29, 10036-10047 (2021). doi: 10.1364/OE.418300
[64] Torunoglu, I. et al. A GPU-based full-chip inverse lithography solution for random patterns. Proceedings of SPIE 7641, Design for Manufacturability through Design-Process Integration IV. San Jose, CA, USA: SPIE, 2010.
[65] Wang, S. B. et al. Machine learning assisted SRAF placement for full chip. Proceedings of SPIE 10451, Photomask Technology 2017. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2017.
[66] Yang, H. Y. et al. GAN-OPC: mask optimization with lithography-guided generative adversarial nets. Proceedings of the 2018 55th ACM/ESDA/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC). San Francisco, CA, USA: IEEE, 2018.
[67] Zhang, Y. J. & Ye, W. J. Deep learning-based inverse method for layout design. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 60, 527-536 (2019). doi: 10.1007/s00158-019-02222-w
[68] Zhang, S. G. et al. Fast optical proximity correction based on graph convolution network. Proceedings of SPIE 11613, Optical Microlithography XXXIV. SPIE, 2021.
[69] Ma, X., et al. Model-driven convolution neural network for inverse lithography. Optics express 26, 32565-32584 (2018). doi: 10.1364/OE.26.032565
[70] Ma, X., Zheng, X. Q. & Arce, G. R. Fast inverse lithography based on dual-channel model-driven deep learning. Optics Express 28, 20404-20421 (2020). doi: 10.1364/OE.396661
[71] Zheng, X. Q., et al. Model-informed deep learning for computational lithography with partially coherent illumination. Optics Express 28, 39475-39491 (2020). doi: 10.1364/OE.413721
[72] Wong, A. K. K. Resolution Enhancement Techniques in Optical Lithography. (SPIE Press, 2001).
[73] Wei, Y. Y., Su, Y. J. & Liu, Y. S. Optical proximity correction in the advanced photolithography. Micronanoelectronic Technology 51, 186-193 (2014).
[74] Chen, Y. Y., et al. Curvilinear mask handling in OPC flow. Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 23, 011203 (2023).
[75] Kim, S., Zhang, S. L. & Shin, Y. ML-guided curvilinear OPC: fast, accurate, and manufacturable curve correction. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 38, 19-28 (2025). doi: 10.1109/TSM.2025.3527514
[76] Huang, W. C., et al. High-fidelity curvilinear mask optical proximity correction using tangent angle-arc length curve. Optics Express 33, 23796-23808 (2025). doi: 10.1364/OE.557176
[77] Zheng, Y. H., et al. Demand-driven dynamic control points insertion for high-fidelity and efficient curvilinear optical proximity correction. Optics Express 34, 7261-7277 (2026). doi: 10.1364/OE.582323
[78] Wang, Y. H. et al. Parametric curvilinear OPC using B-splines data format. Proceedings of SPIE 13991, Ninth International Workshop on Advanced Patterning Solutions (IWAPS 2025). Shenzhen, China: IEEE, 2025.
[79] Hooker, K. et al. Curvilinear mask solutions for full-chip EUV lithography. Proceedings of SPIE 12054, Novel Patterning Technologies 2022. San Jose, CA, USA: SPIE, 2022.
[80] Liubich, V. et al. Rapid full-chip curvilinear OPC for advanced logic and memory. Proceedings of SPIE 11855, Photomask Technology 2021. SPIE, 2021.
[81] Seo, L. et al. Improved manufacturability in curvilinear OPC for random DRAM contacts. Proceedings of SPIE 13425, DTCO and Computational Patterning IV. San Jose, CA, USA: SPIE, 2025.
[82] Bork, I. et al. Curvature based fragmentation for curvilinear mask process correction. Proceedings of SPIE 11855, Photomask Technology 2021. SPIE, 2021.
[83] Kaneko, A. et al. Improvements on pattern fidelity at high curvature region of curvilinear mask with a novel method of MPC. Proceedings of SPIE 12751, Photomask Technology 2023. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2023.
[84] Kaneko, A. et al. Enhancing mask process correction on curvilinear data with Bézier curve representation. Proceedings of SPIE 13216, Photomask Technology 2024. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2024.
[85] Liu, C. H. & Din, Z. A. Geometry-based curvilinear mask process correction for enhanced pattern fidelity, contrast, and manufacturability. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 38, 36-47 (2025). doi: 10.1109/TSM.2024.3521368
[86] Nakayamada, N., et al. Curvilinear mask process correction embedded on multi-beam mask writer. Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 23, 011206 (2024). doi: 10.1117/1.jmm.23.1.011206
[87] Bork, I. et al. CLMPC: curvilinear MPC in a mask data preparation flow. Proceedings of SPIE 10451, Photomask Technology 2017. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2017.
[88] Sharma, R. et al. A method for calibrating a curvature-based pre-bias model for advanced mask process correction applications. Proceedings of SPIE 12293, Photomask Technology 2022. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2022.
[89] Bajpai, A. et al. Benefits of an integrated pipelined flow for curvilinear MPC and multibeam fracture. Proceedings of SPIE 11855, Photomask Technology 2021. SPIE, 2021.
[90] Pearman, R. et al. Adopting curvilinear shapes for production ILT: challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of SPIE 11148, Photomask Technology 2019. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2019.
[91] Zeggaoui, N. et al. Fast full chip curvilinear MRC for advanced manufacturing nodes. Proceedings of SPIE 12954, DTCO and Computational Patterning III. San Jose, CA, USA: SPIE, 2024.
[92] Kim, J. K. et al. A study that enhances the accuracy of multigon-based curvilinear mask rule check. Proceedings of SPIE 13655, Photomask Japan 2025: XXXI Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology. Yokohama, Japan: SPIE, 2025.
[93] Raj, A. et al. Multigon-based curvilinear mask rule checks for advanced mask data preparation applications. Proceedings of SPIE 13216, Photomask Technology 2024. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2024.
[94] Klein, C. & Platzgummer, E. MBMW-101: world’s 1st high-throughput multi-beam mask writer. Proceedings of SPIE 9985, Photomask Technology 2016. San Jose, CA, USA: SPIE, 2016.
[95] Nomura, H. et al. Multi-beam mask writer MBM-2000PLUS. Proceedings of SPIE 12325, Photomask Japan 2022: XXVIII Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology. SPIE, 2022.
[96] Matsumoto, H. et al. Multi-beam mask writer MBM-3000 for next generation EUV mask production. Proceedings of SPIE 12751, Photomask Technology 2023. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2023.
[97] Pang, L. Y., et al. Make the impossible possible: use variable-shaped beam mask writers and curvilinear full-chip inverse lithography technology for 193i contacts/vias with mask-wafer co-optimization. Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 23, 011207 (2024). doi: 10.1117/1.jmm.23.1.011207
[98] Pang, L. L. et al. Enabling faster VSB writing of 193i curvilinear ILT masks that improve wafer process windows for advanced memory applications. Proceedings of SPIE 11518, Photomask Technology 2020. SPIE, 2020.
[99] Klein, C. , Loeschner, H. & Platzgummer, E. Performance of the proof-of-concept multi-beam mask writer (MBMW POC). Proceedings of SPIE 8880, Photomask Technology 2013. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2013.
[100] Tomandl, M., et al. Multi-beam mask writing opens up new fields of application, including curvilinear mask pattern for high numerical aperture extreme ultraviolet lithography. Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 23, 011205 (2024). doi: 10.1117/1.jmm.23.1.011205
[101] Li, M. C. et al. Curvilinear metrology in advance mask making process quality enhancement. Proceedings of SPIE 13655, Photomask Japan 2025: XXXI Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology. Yokohama, Japan: SPIE, 2025.
[102] Pang, L. Y. et al. Curvilinear mask metrology: what is the equivalent critical dimension?. Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 23, 021304 (2024). doi: 10.1117/1.jmm.23.2.021304
[103] Pang, L. Y. et al. Curvilinear mask metrology: what’s the 2D equivalent of CD?. Proceedings of SPIE 13177, Photomask Japan 2024: XXX Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology. Yokohama, Japan: SPIE, 2024.
[104] Delorme, M. et al. Curvilinear EUV mask: development of innovative mask metrology. Proceedings of SPIE 12325, Photomask Japan 2022: XXVIII Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology. SPIE, 2022.
[105] Trivković, D. et al. Unfolding the curves: novel designs and metrology methods for curvilinear masks qualification. Proceedings of SPIE 13216, Photomask Technology 2024. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2024.
[106] Bekaert, J. et al. High-NA EUV mask pattern characterization using advanced mask CD-SEM metrology. Proceedings of SPIE 13273, 39th European Mask and Lithography Conference (EMLC 2024). Grenoble, France: SPIE, 2024.
[107] Guo, J. et al. Holistic EPE measurement and qualification by large field of view (LFOV) contour-based metrology. Proceedings of SPIE 13426, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control XXXIX. San Jose, CA, USA: SPIE, 2025.
[108] Ishida, T. et al. Challenges in wafer metrology for advanced technology nodes. Proceedings of SPIE 13655, Photomask Japan 2025: XXXI Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology. Yokohama, Japan: SPIE, 2025.
[109] Bekaert, J. et al. High-NA EUV mask CD-SEM metrology matching, and contour-based comparison of simulation result and wafer print. Proceedings of SPIE 13655, Photomask Technology 2025. Yokohama, Japan: SPIE, 2025.
[110] Wei, C. I. et al. High-NA EUV optical proximity correction modeling flow: from data preparation to model validation. Proceedings of SPIE 13687, Photomask Technology 2025. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2025.
[111] Gharat, S. et al. A study on various curvilinear data representations and their impact on mask manufacturing flow. Proceedings of SPIE 11613, Optical Microlithography XXXIVSPIE. 2021.
[112] Visvalingam, M. & Whyatt, J. D. Line generalization by repeated elimination of points. Landmarks in Mapping (ed Kent, A. ) (London: Routledge, 2017), 144-155.
[113] Choi, J., et al. SStudy on various curvilinear data representations and their impact on mask and wafer manufacturing. Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 20, 041403 (2021).
[114] Bayle, S. et al. Data preparation in the age of curvilinear patterns. Proceedings of SPIE 10454, Photomask Japan 2017: XXIV Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology. Yokohama, Japan: SPIE, 2017.
[115] Ban, Y. et al. Multigon curvy mask manufacturability and advantage. Proceedings of SPIE 13655, Photomask Japan 2025: XXXI Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology. Yokohama, Japan: SPIE, SPIE, 2025.
[116] Pan, D. Z., et al. From classical algorithms to AI: evolving trends in VLSI physical design automation. IEEE Design & Test 42, 30-39 (2025). doi: 10.1109/MDAT.2025.3603108
[117] Choi, J. et al. Status of curvilinear data format working group. Proceedings of SPIE 12325, Photomask Japan 2022: XXVIII Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology. SPIE, 2022.
[118] Durvasula, B. et al. Opportunities, challenges, and applications of native curvilinear data representation in post-tape-out flows. Proceedings of SPIE 12751, Photomask Technology 2023. Monterey, CA, USA: SPIE, 2023.
[119] Venitucci, B. et al. Layout curvilinear representations impact on high-NA masks: a comparative study. Proceedings of SPIE 13273, 39th European Mask and Lithography Conference (EMLC 2024). Grenoble, France: SPIE, 2024.