| [1] | Mack, C. A. Thirty years of lithography simulation. Proceedings of SPIE 5754, Optical Microlithography XVIII. San Jose: SPIE, 2005. |
| [2] | Erdmann, A. et al. Lithography simulation: modeling techniques and selected applications. Proceedings of SPIE 7390, Modeling Aspects in Optical Metrology II. Munich: SPIE, 2009, 13-29. |
| [3] | Ma, X. & Arce, G. R. Computational Lithography. (Hoboken: Wiley, 2010). |
| [4] | Lai, K. F. Review of computational lithography modeling: focusing on extending optical lithography and design-technology co-optimization. Advanced Optical Technologies 1, 249-267 (2012). |
| [5] | Erdmann, A. et al. Optical and EUV projection lithography: a computational view. Microelectronic Engineering 132, 21-34 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.mee.2014.09.011 |
| [6] | Pomplun, J. et al. Reduced basis method for source mask optimization. Proceedings of SPIE 7823, Photomask Technology 2010. Monterey: SPIE, 2010, 78230E. |
| [7] | Pang, L. Y. et al. Study of mask and wafer co-design that utilizes a new extreme SIMD approach to computing in memory manufacturing: full-chip curvilinear ILT in a day. Proceedings of SPIE 11148, Photomask Technology 2019. Monterey: SPIE, 2019, 111480U. |
| [8] | Granik, Y. Transformational invariance in compact process modeling. Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS 19, 013502 (2020). |
| [9] | Liu, P. et al. Fast and accurate 3D mask model for full-chip OPC and verification. Proceedings of SPIE 6520, Optical Microlithography XX. San Jose: SPIE, 2007, 65200R. |
| [10] | Yan, Q. L. , Deng, Z. J. & Shiely, J. Fast synthesis of topographic mask effects based on rigorous solutions. Proceedings of SPIE 6730, Photomask Technology 2007. Monterey: SPIE, 2007, 67302N. |
| [11] | Abrams, D. S. & Pang, L. Y. Fast inverse lithography technology. Proceedings of SPIE 6154, Optical Microlithography XIX. San Jose: SPIE, 2006, 61541J. |
| [12] | Pang, L. Y. Inverse lithography technology: 30 years from concept to practical, full-chip reality. Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 20, 030901 (2021). doi: 10.1117/1.jmm.20.3.030901 |
| [13] | Shendre, A. & Fujimura, A. Leaping into the curvy world with GPU-accelerated O(p) computing. Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 23, 041505 (2024). |
| [14] | Kim, B. G. et al. Trade-off between inverse lithography mask complexity and lithographic performance. Proceedings of SPIE 7379, Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology XVI. Yokohama: SPIE, 2009, 73791M. |
| [15] | Hooker, K. et al. Curvilinear mask solutions for full-chip EUV lithography. Proceedings of SPIE 12054, Novel Patterning Technologies 2022. San Jose: SPIE, 2022, 1205407. |
| [16] | Vidal-Russell, E. Curvilinear masks extend lithography options for advanced node memory roadmaps. Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 23, 041504 (2024). |
| [17] | Tomandl, M. et al. Multi-beam mask writing opens up new fields of application, including curvilinear mask pattern for high numerical aperture extreme ultraviolet lithography. Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 23, 011205 (2024). doi: 10.1117/1.jmm.23.1.011205 |
| [18] | Choi, J. et al. Status of curvilinear data format working group. Proceedings of SPIE 12325, Photomask Japan 2022: XXVIII Symposium on Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology. Online: SPIE, 2022, 1232508. |
| [19] | Pang, L. Y. & Fujimura, A. Why the mask world is moving to curvilinear. Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology 23, 041503 (2024). |
| [20] | Wei, D. H. et al. Mathematical foundations of a geometric theory of diffraction for light scattering from a 3D topographic photomask. Proceedings of 2019 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium-Spring. Rome: IEEE, 2019. |
| [21] | Oskooi, A. F. et al. MEEP: a flexible free-software package for electromagnetic simulations by the FDTD method. Computer Physics Communications 181, 687-702 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.11.008 |
| [22] | Ding, H. W. et al. Three-dimensional plasmonic lithography imaging modeling based on the RCWA algorithm for computational lithography. Optics Express 31, 36061-36077 (2023). doi: 10.1364/OE.500590 |
| [23] | Shao, F. et al. Fast rigorous simulation of mask diffraction using the waveguide method with parallelized decomposition technique. Proceedings of the 24th European Mask and Lithography Conference. Dresden: VDE, 2008. |
| [24] | Adam, K. & Neureuther, A. R. Methodology for accurate and rapid simulation of large arbitrary 2D layouts of advanced photomasks. Proceedings of SPIE 4562, 21st Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology. Monterey: SPIE, 2002. |
| [25] | Tirapu-Azpiroz, J. , Burchard, P. & Yablonovitch, E. Boundary layer model to account for thick mask effects in photolithography. Proceedings of SPIE 5040, Optical Microlithography XVI. Santa Clara: SPIE, 2003. |
| [26] | Liu, P. et al. A full-chip 3D computational lithography framework. Proceedings of SPIE 8326, Optical Microlithography XXV. San Jose: SPIE, 2012, 83260A. |
| [27] | Zhu, K. Y. et al. Ultrasound modulated laser confocal feedback imaging inside turbid media. Optics Letters 43, 1207-1210 (2018). doi: 10.1364/OL.43.001207 |
| [28] | Ma, X. et al. Fast lithography aerial image calculation method based on machine learning. Applied Optics 56, 6485-6495 (2017). doi: 10.1364/AO.56.006485 |
| [29] | Ye, W. et al. TEMPO: fast mask topography effect modeling with deep learning. Proceedings of 2020 International Symposium on Physical Design. Taipei, China: ACM (2020). |
| [30] | Li, Z. Q. et al. High-precision lithography thick-mask model based on a decomposition machine learning method. Optics Express 30, 17680-17697 (2022). doi: 10.1364/OE.454513 |
| [31] | Shendre, A. et al. You don't need 1nm contours for curvilinear shapes: pixel-based computing is the answer. Proceedings of SPIE 12293, Photomask Technology 2022. Monterey: SPIE, 2022, 1229307. |
| [32] | Lam, M. et al. Accurate, full chip 3D electromagnetic field model for non-Manhattan mask corners. Proceedings of SPIE 9426, Optical Microlithography XXVIII. San Jose: SPIE, 2015, 94260P. |
| [33] | Zhang, H. B. et al. An accurate ILT-enabling full-chip mask 3D model for all-angle patterns. Proceedings of SPIE 8880, Photomask Technology 2013. Monterey: SPIE, 2013, 88800G. |
| [34] | Lai, C. J. , Zhou, X. & Peng, D. P. Method of modeling a mask having patterns with arbitrary angles. (2021). |
| [35] | Natterer, F. The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography. (Philadelphia: SIAM, 2001). |
| [36] | Helgason, S. Geometric Analysis on Symmetric Spaces. 2nd edn. Providence: American Mathematical Society (2024). |
| [37] | Born, M. & Wolf, E. Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light. 6th edn. Oxford: Pergamon Press (1980). |
| [38] | Zhou, X. J. et al. Efficient representation of mask transmittance functions for vectorial lithography simulations. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 31, B10-B18 (2014). doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.31.000B10 |
| [39] | Zhang, H. B. et al. A pattern- and optics-independent compact model of Mask3D under off-axis illumination with significant efficiency and accuracy improvements. Proceedings of SPIE 9426, Optical Microlithography XXVIII. San Jose: SPIE, 2015, 94260Q. |
| [40] | Chen, Y. Y. et al. Manhattan and curvilinear mask error correction. Proceedings of SPIE 13216, Photomask Technology 2024. Monterey: SPIE, 2024, 132161M. |
| [41] | Guo, S. P. et al. Mask3D-compatible full-vectorial Hopkins imaging for lithographic modeling. Optica 12, 924-934 (2025). doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.565511 |