Citation:

Comment on "In vivo flow cytometry reveals a circadian rhythm of circulating tumor cells"


  • Light: Science & Applications  10, Article number: (2021)
More Information
  • Corresponding author:
    Mark Niedre (m.niedre@northeastern.edu)
  • Received: 23 July 2021
    Accepted: 25 August 2021
    Published online: 17 September 2021

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00624-4

  • 加载中
  • [1] Habli, Z., AlChamaa, W., Saab, R., Kadara, H. & Khraiche, M. L. Circulating tumor cell detection technologies and clinical utility: challenges and opportunities. Cancers (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071930 (2020).
    [2] Zhu, X. et al. In vivo flow cytometry reveals a circadian rhythm of circulating tumor cells. Light Sci. Appl 10, 110 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41377-021-00542-5
    [3] Williams, A. L., Fitzgerald, J. E., Ivich, F., Sontag, E. D. & Niedre, M. Short-term circulating tumor cell dynamics in mouse xenograft models and implications for liquid biopsy. Front. Oncol. 10, 601085 (2020). doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.601085
    [4] Juratli, M. A. et al. Dynamic fluctuation of circulating tumor cells during cancer progression. Cancers (Basel) 6, 128–142 (2014). doi: 10.3390/cancers6010128
    [5] Zettergren, E. et al. Instrument for fluorescence sensing of circulating cells with diffuse light in mice in vivo. J. Biomed. Opt. 17, 037001 (2012). doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.3.037001
    [6] Tibbe, A. G., Miller, M. C. & Terstappen, L. W. Statistical considerations for enumeration of circulating tumor cells. Cytom. A 71, 154–162 (2007). doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20369
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(122) PDF downloads(57) Citation(0) Citation counts are provided from Web of Science. The counts may vary by service, and are reliant on the availability of their data.

Comment on "In vivo flow cytometry reveals a circadian rhythm of circulating tumor cells"

  • 1. Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
  • 2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
  • 3. Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
  • Corresponding author:

    Mark Niedre, m.niedre@northeastern.edu

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00624-4

  • Dear Editor,

    Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are instrumental in hematogenous metastasis and are widely studied using liquid biopsy methods. These involve analysis and characterization of CTCs from fractionally small blood samples drawn from patients1. Liquid biopsy implicitly assumes that the number and phenotypical distribution of CTCs in small blood samples is representative of the full peripheral blood volume, and furthermore that CTC numbers are approximately constant over the days and hours surrounding the blood draw.

    Recently, Zhu2 et al. reported in Light that this assumption is at times dubious. In particular, they used a fluorescence microscopy method called "in vivo flow cytometry" (IVFC) to show that the number of CTCs in circulation may indeed vary significantly over the short term. In particular, they demonstrated a significant circadian effect in a mouse prostate cancer model, and temporal behavior that is significantly more dynamic than is generally assumed. As a result, enumeration of CTCs from small blood samples could lead to significant under- or over-estimation of CTC numbers.

    The authors appear to be unaware of prior work published by our group3 and by Juratli et al.4, neither of which were cited. Our paper3 presented similar in vivo optical measurements (using "diffuse in vivo flow cytometry"), in mouse xenograft models, which was based on long-standing research at our lab at Northeastern University5. We explicitly showed significant short-term (minutes, hours, days) fluctuations in tumor cell numbers in circulation, and that CTC detection statistics deviated from Poisson which are widely assumed6. We also demonstrated the superiority of multi-sample averaging approaches in accurate quantification of CTC numbers. We did search for circadian variations in CTC numbers in a multiple myeloma mouse xenograft model, but did not observe one as did Zhu et. al. in a prostate cancer model2. Likewise, Juratli et al.4 used microscopy-IVFC and observed that CTC numbers in mice in general did not correlate with tumor size, and that the rate of CTC detection using their instrument was highly variable over short time periods. They showed that this was true in epithelial and non-epithelial tumor models.

    We believe that these works and others reflect important insights into short-term circulation dynamics of CTCs that are currently poorly understood and may ultimately contribute to a more complete understanding of hematogenous metastasis. We are also gratified that multiple teams of investigators could independently confirm similar results in different animal models. However, we do believe that the scientific record should be corrected to reflect prior contributions to the field.

Conflict of interest
  • The authors declare no competing interests.

Reference (6)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img PowerPoint
    Return
    Return