Silica optical fibers have attracted a lot of attention because they are widely used in communications and sensing, and forming today’s internet backbone. Driving much of the Internet-of-Things (IoT) evolution, optical fibers are expanding from a single function transmission technology to perform multiple functions and a growing need for various custom-design application-specific optical fibers. Current optical fiber manufacturing based on chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technologies together with stack-and-draw approaches used for structured optical fibers faces numerous challenges in enabling more complex geometries multimaterial composite fibers and multicore fibers. The additive manufacturing, or 3D printing, offers a solution to address all those challenges, and may potentially disrupt the optical fibers fabrication and bring in an evolution to IoT1-2.
The additive manufacture of optical fiber preforms and optical fiber has recently been proposed and demonstrated3-6. A key challenge of 3D printing-based silica optical fibers is the high processing temperatures of silica glass that conventional top down approaches demand. For this reason, we exploited and extended recent reports of small-scale glass “bulk or slice” printing7-15 beyond a few millimeters to centimeters16 to demonstrate it was possible to additively manufacture optical fibers. Further, various active dopants were introduced. These include oxides and ions of bismuth and erbium to create additively manufactured bismuth and erbium co-doped optical fiber (BEDF). These fibers are known to have an ultra-broadband near infrared (NIR) luminescence covering the whole telecommunications O-L bands with 830 nm pump excitation, potentially appearing to be a promising active medium of fiber amplifiers for the next generation of fiber communication system17-23.
In this letter, we report BEDFs with one and seven cores drawn from 3D printed preforms. The capability of 3D printing technology to produce complex and arbitrary fiber structures was demonstrated without the necessary time-consuming separation and integration processes involved in the traditional preform manufacture. In addition, a range of dopants, namely Bi3+, Er3+, Ge4+, Ti4+ and Al3+ are introduced, further proving its diverse materials manufacturing capability. Care is needed in adjusting drawing conditions and method as the number of cores increases, leading to effective lower melting points in the preform.
As reported in ref. 16, the fabrication of 3D printed preforms involved five steps: (1) preparing UV sensitive resin embedded with amorphous silica nanoparticles; (2) printing designed preform utilizing a commercial DLP 3D printer; (3) filling the prepared resin into the holes of the printed cladding preform followed by thermal-polymerization; (4) debinding and pre-sintering process driven by annealing to remove moisture and polymer support and pre-fusing of nanoparticles; and (5) higher temperature sintering to further remove impurities and fuse silica nanoparticles into glass during fiber drawing. The fiber preforms with structures of one and seven cores shown in the first row of Fig. 1e were first designed using AutoCAD. The inner d and outer D diameters of the fiber preforms are d = 3 mm and D = 22 mm, respectively. The distance between two closest cores Λ is 5 mm and the preform length L is 40 mm. The designed preforms were then loaded into a 3D direct light projection (DLP) printer (Asiga Australia: model PRO2). The preforms were printed 2D layer-by layer using near UV light (λ = 385 nm) translated in the vertical direction. The main printing parameters are UV light intensity IUV, UV curing time tcuring and layer thickness τ, which are IUV = 5.8 mW/cm2, tcuring = 3.5 s, and τ = 75 μm, respectively.
The composition of the resin used for preform fabrication is described in the Method section. The fabricated preforms were annealed to remove moisture and then sintered to debind the polymer resin using a high temperature furnace (Furnace Technologies Australia, 1700 M). The preforms were heated up to T = 150, 300, 600, 800 and 1200 ℃ for 2, 4, 4, 1.5 and 2 hrs, with the heating rate of 0.5 ℃ /min and 3 ℃ /min, respectively, before and after T = 600 ℃. The mass, diameter and height changes of the fiber preforms were also investigated during the debinding process as demonstrated by the inset of Fig. 1b. The mass of the preforms decreases when the debinding temperature is under T < 600 ℃, and then is unchanged in the following process. This is consistent with removal of the polymer and other impurities at T < 600 ℃. When annealed at higher temperatures (T > 600 ℃) the preforms begin to shrink, the shrinkage of preform diameters and heights were around 28% and 27% respectively from T = 600 ℃ to 1200 ℃, as shown in the inset of Fig. 1b. If the preform were completely sintered to the dense glass state, the theoretical shrinkage would be 34%24-25. The temperature process of 600−1200 ℃ in this experiment was only to densify the fiber preform and improved its mechanical strength for the next step of fiber drawing, rather than sintering the preform into a glass, therefore the shrinkage was smaller than the theoretical value.
The preform after debinding was inserted into a Heraeus F300 quartz tube and drawn into the fiber using a commercial fiber drawing tower. The temperature during the whole fiber drawing process was logged during drawing shown in Fig. 1c. Similar to the previous work16, the drawing temperature and pressure are kept to T = 1850 ℃ and P = 50 mbar, respectively. The fiber preform was heated to T = 810 ℃, and kept for 3 hrs at a pressure of P = 50 mbar for removing the moisture absorbed by the preform due to the porous structure during storage. The inserted X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern was obtained by using the powdered 3D-printed BEDF without coating.
An optical assessment was carried out of the cores of the BEDFs. The cross-section microscopy images of two kinds of BEDFs are shown in the middle row of Fig. 1e. In all cases the core is not perfectly circular. As for the seven cores BEDFs, although multicore structures are kept, crack and shrinkage are noticed. It appears that the cores have physically displaced, reflecting a poor fit of the preform with the Heraeus tube and a too high fiber drawing temperature. To determine the element distribution of the fiber core and cladding after the high-temperature drawing, electron probe micro-Analysis (EPMA) was performed on the 7-core cross section shown in Fig. 2a. The Ge and Ti distributions are in the core whereas the Si is located as expected in both the core and cladding areas, shown in Fig. 2b−d. The Bi and Er were not detected because the concentrations were too low. A hole is presented in one of the cores which arises owing to the air bubbles entrapped during the fiber drawing and may be eliminated via the optimization of the fabrication process.
The three-dimensional refractive index of BEDFs was further measured with a SHR-1802 optical fiber index analyzer. The refractive index difference between core and cladding is obvious in the seven cores BEDFs, despite the existence of the melted state of the core and cladding due to excessive temperature during the fiber drawing process, shown in Fig. 3b. The maximum refractive index difference between the core and the cladding is $ \Delta n \sim 0.01 $ in the single core BEDF, demonstrated in Fig. 3a. The cut-off wavelength was estimated to be $ {\lambda _c} \sim 800\;{\rm{nm}} $ for the single core BEDF with the core diameter of d ~ 3.5 μm as shown in Fig. 3a, where the measured cutoff was located at $ \lambda \sim 757$ nm. The value is smaller than the target one (${\lambda _c} \sim 1000\;{\rm{nm}}$) based on material concentrations because of material evaporation during the fabrication process, a quantity that can be taken into account in subsequent pulls.
In addition, the fiber loss was measured by the cutback over the wavelength range of λ = 750−1600 nm, the experimental configuration and the loss spectrum of the single core BEDF are shown in Fig. 4a, b. Four absorption peaks are clearly observed. The absorption at λ = 810 nm is attributed to a third water overtone and possibly a bismuth active center related to a speculative Si (BAC-Si)23. At λ = 1535 nm the absorption is due to Er3+26. However, the absorption peak of Er3+ is not particularly significant because of the relatively low doping concentration. Another absorption peak at λ = 980 nm is characteristic of a second overtone band of water ~ 1 um and may have a component from a center related to Al (BAC-Al) 23 and Er3+26. The similar situation occurs at the absorption peak at λ = 1380 nm, for which the absorption of BAC-Si overlaps with the first OH overtone is responsible. It is worth noting that the absorption at λ = 1380 nm is α ~ 12.7 dB/m, an improvement over previous results for a germanosilicate fiber (α ~ 20.9 dB/m at 1380 nm)16 where moisture and background scattering due to core asymmetry gives rise to an additional loss of ~ 8.0 dB/m. It’s worth noting that the optical fiber in this report was doped with bismuth compared to the dopants-free optical fiber in Ref. 16, to be precise, the loss difference was at least 8 dB/m because of losses related with the doping of bismuth. This reduction is simply the removal of that component with an additional annealing at 810 ℃ during the fiber drawing process27. The losses of three cores in the seven cores BEDF were individually tested at 632.8 nm using a He-Ne laser, labeled with yellow font in the Fig. 4b. The single core fiber has a smaller loss, while the multicore fibers have greater losses partly because the presence coupling between the cores. Besides, some of the cores are so asymmetric that they have turned into a tubular shape, resulting in nontrivial scattering from both the inside and outside of the cores. This is direct evidence of flowing and the drawing temperature being well above the melting temperature of the preform.
The luminescent spectra obtained by pumping at λ = 830 nm and 980 nm were recorded with a monochromator and a photodetector, as shown in Fig. 4c. A lock-in amplifier was used to boost the signal to noise ratio. For the λ = 830 nm excitation, there are three luminescence bands over λ = (1000−1600) nm - see Fig. 4d. The first two peaks are located at λ = 1100 nm and λ = 1420 nm with bandwidths of $ \Delta { \lambda }_{FWHM} $ = 150 nm and $ \Delta { \lambda }_{FWHM} $ = 100 nm, attributed to the BAC-Al and BAC-Si respectively17,23. The λ = 1535 nm peak with $ \Delta { \lambda }_{FWHM} $ = 32 nm is attributed to the Er3+: 4I13/2 → 4I15/2 transition. Similarly, two peaks at λ = 1150 nm $ \Delta { \lambda }_{FWHM} $ = 148 nm and λ = 1535 nm with $ \Delta { \lambda }_{FWHM} $ = 28 nm under the λ = 980 nm pumping are attributed to the BAC-Al and Er3+ emissions, respectively. The wider FWHM and the peak shift with different excitations of BACs show typical unshielded d-d transitions of bismuth ions. The mode of single core BEDF was analyzed at the emission peaks where λ = 1100, 1420 and 1530 nm. Only LP01 mode exists, and the mode distributions are demonstrated in Fig. 5a−c. The mode fields are still elliptical as determined by the shape of the fiber core. The long/short axis of the mode field diameters are 5.2/ 5.0, 6.9/ 6.6 and 7.6/ 7.4 μm at 1100, 1420 and 1530 nm, respectively.
In summary, bismuth and erbium co-doped optical fibers with single- and seven-cores were drawn from 3D printed preforms. We show that the asymmetry arises principally from too high temperature and melting of the core and cladding of the preform within the Heraeus silica tube. The broadband NIR luminescence is obtained under the 830 nm and 980 nm excitations. The fiber loss in the single core fiber is substantially reduced as compared to the previous reports most likely due to a) the removal of water via the additional annealing and sintering treatment, and b) the improved symmetry due to the better shape match between the preform and the Heraeus tube. 3D printing technology promises to revolutionize specialty optical fibers permitting new functionalities. For example, it can easily realize multicore fiber fan-in/fan-out or ideal mode coupling in space division multiplexing without any splicing.