Article Contents

Citation:

Author Correction: Accuracy characterization of Shack–Hartmann sensor with residual error removal in spherical wavefront calibration


  • Light: Advanced Manufacturing  7, Article number: 101 (2026)
More Information

doi: https://doi.org/10.37188/lam.2026.101

  • 加载中
  • [1] He et al. Accuracy characterization of Shack–Hartmann sensor with residual error removal in spherical wavefront calibration. Light: Advanced Manufacturing 4, 36 (2023). doi: 10.37188/lam.2023.036
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(30) PDF downloads(10) Citation(0) Citation counts are provided from Web of Science. The counts may vary by service, and are reliant on the availability of their data.

Author Correction: Accuracy characterization of Shack–Hartmann sensor with residual error removal in spherical wavefront calibration

  • 1. School of Biomedical Engineering (Suzhou), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • 2. Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215163, China
  • Corresponding author:

    Guohua Shi, ghshi_lab@sibet.ac.cn

doi: https://doi.org/10.37188/lam.2026.101

  • Correction to: Light: Advanced Manufacturing

    https://doi.org/10.37188/lam.2023.036

    Published online 01 December 2023

    In the originally published version of this article1, there were inadvertent reporting errors in Tables 2, 4, and 5. In Table 4, the Group 2 value in the x direction for the tilt angle between the MLA surface and the photodetector surface was incorrectly reported as “−0.034 mrad”; it should read “+0.034 mrad”. With this correction, the reported averaged value of “0.098 mrad” and the reported standard deviation value of “0.211 mrad” in the x direction are consistent with the recalculated results.

    In addition, in Tables 2, 4, and 5, the row labeled “Variance value” should read “Standard deviation value” or “SD”, because the reported values correspond to standard deviations rather than statistical variances.

    These corrections are limited to the reporting of table values and statistical terminology. They do not affect the experimental design, measurement procedure, data interpretation, main findings, or conclusions of the article.

    We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

    The original paper has been updated.

Reference (1)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img PowerPoint
    Return
    Return