Article Contents

Citation:

Ultrafast and ambient-immune tandem architectures for 1,550-nm LiDAR application


  • Light: Advanced Manufacturing  7, Article number: 133 (2026)
More Information
  • Corresponding author:
    Yu-Hao Deng (yuhao.deng@ugent.be)
  • Received: 03 September 2026
    Revised: 23 September 2026
    Accepted: 30 September 2026
    Published online: 10 October 2026

doi: https://doi.org/10.37188/lam.2026.133

  • A recently reported tandem colloidal quantum dot photodiode architecture simultaneously addresses two long-standing challenges related to response speed and spectral selectivity in 1,550-nm light detection and ranging (LiDAR) application. By halving the effective junction capacitance through series-connected subcells and suppressing visible-light interference, this work demonstrates a promising route toward solution-processed 3D LiDAR sensing. In the future, combining this architectural concept with low-dielectric-constant material platforms and robust surface defect engineering could further reduce speed limitations while enhancing tolerance to ambient-light interference, potentially enabling picosecond-scale response in next-generation LiDAR systems.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Yang, J. R. et al. Spectral-selective light detection and ranging at 1550 nm using tandem colloidal quantum dot photodiodes. Light: Science & Applications 15, 355 (2026). doi: 10.1038/s41377-026-02244-2
    [2] Deng, Y. H. et al. Short-wave infrared colloidal QD photodetector with nanosecond response times enabled by ultrathin absorber layers. Advanced Materials 36, 2402002 (2024). doi: 10.1002/adma.202402002
    [3] Deng, Y. H. et al. A bifunctional colloidal quantum dot diode for nanosecond short-wave infrared detection and emission. Advanced Materials 38, e74108 (2026). doi: 10.1002/adma.74108
    [4] Biondi, M. et al. Facet-oriented coupling enables fast and sensitive colloidal quantum dot photodetectors. Advanced Materials 33, 2101056 (2021). doi: 10.1002/adma.202101056
    [5] Vafaie, M. et al. Colloidal quantum dot photodetectors with 10-ns response time and 80% quantum efficiency at 1, 550 nm. Matter 4, 1042-1053 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2020.12.017
    [6] Xia, P. et al. Improved facet and edge passivation in near-infrared III-V colloidal quantum dot photodetectors. Advanced Materials 37, 2419020 (2025). doi: 10.1002/adma.202419020
    [7] Sun, B. et al. Fast near-infrared photodetection using III-V colloidal quantum dots. Advanced Materials 34, 2203039 (2022). doi: 10.1002/adma.202203039
    [8] Chen, H. et al. InF3 surface passivation on InAs quantum dots enhances photoluminescence and reduces trap-induced dark current in shortwave infrared photodetectors. ACS Nano 20, 23822-23836 (2026). doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6c06196
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(17) PDF downloads(9) Citation(0) Citation counts are provided from Web of Science. The counts may vary by service, and are reliant on the availability of their data.

Ultrafast and ambient-immune tandem architectures for 1,550-nm LiDAR application

  • Physics and Chemistry of Nanostructures Group, Ghent University, Gent 9000, Belgium
  • Corresponding author:

    Yu-Hao Deng, yuhao.deng@ugent.be

doi: https://doi.org/10.37188/lam.2026.133

Abstract: A recently reported tandem colloidal quantum dot photodiode architecture simultaneously addresses two long-standing challenges related to response speed and spectral selectivity in 1,550-nm light detection and ranging (LiDAR) application. By halving the effective junction capacitance through series-connected subcells and suppressing visible-light interference, this work demonstrates a promising route toward solution-processed 3D LiDAR sensing. In the future, combining this architectural concept with low-dielectric-constant material platforms and robust surface defect engineering could further reduce speed limitations while enhancing tolerance to ambient-light interference, potentially enabling picosecond-scale response in next-generation LiDAR systems.

  • Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems are critical to emerging three-dimensional imaging applications, from autonomous driving to mixed reality. The operational wavelength for LiDAR is transitioning from 905 nm to 1,550 nm, driven by the higher eye-safe laser power thresholds (1,550 nm), reduced atmospheric scattering, and extended detection ranges. While commercial 1,550-nm systems rely on InGaAs photodiodes, scaling these detectors to large-area arrays is costly because of the complex epitaxial fabrication and yield-limiting flip-chip bonding processes for array-level integration. Solution-processed colloidal quantum dots (QDs) are promising low-cost alternatives that can be monolithically integrated with silicon-based readout circuits.

    However, the application of QD photodiodes to LiDAR has historically been hindered by two physical bottlenecks. First, QDs show an inherently stronger absorption coefficient in the visible spectrum than at the target wavelength of 1,550 nm. Consequently, practical LiDAR systems rely on external optical bandpass filters to reject ambient solar interference. However, out-of-band leakage through the optical filter can degrade the signal-to-noise ratio under strong ambient illumination1. Second, achieving nanosecond-scale response times in QD devices is constrained by the inherent trade-off between carrier transit time and RC delay: decreasing the absorber thickness shortens the carrier transit time but increases the junction capacitance, thereby increasing the RC delay2,3.

    Yang et al. recently developed a tandem PbSe QD photodiode architecture to simultaneously overcome the speed and spectral selectivity limitations in 1,550-nm LiDAR application1. Vertical stacking of two identical subcells separated by a 1-nm evaporated Au recombination layer effectively decoupled these competing speed-limiting factors. When two identical subcells are connected in series, the effective capacitance can be nearly halved without increasing the carrier transit length, yielding a response time of 1.01 ns. Furthermore, this architecture allows for the intrinsic suppression of visible background light. Visible light is primarily absorbed by the front cell, creating a photocurrent mismatch with the rear cell. Because of the current continuity condition imposed by the series connection, the excess carriers generated by visible light in the front cell are not collected by the tandem device and instead undergo non-radiative recombination. This selective suppression of charge collection, which effectively narrows the spectral response, is referred to as charge-collection narrowing. Consequently, the external quantum efficiency (EQE) in the visible band is suppressed by a factor of 13, i.e., the EQE is reduced to 7%, while the photoresponse at 1,550 nm is preserved. To place these results in context, Table 1 compares the performance of the tandem device with that of representative nanosecond-scale short-wave infrared (SWIR) colloidal QD single devices. Recent single-junction devices have achieved response times in the range of 2–10 ns while maintaining high EQEs at the target wavelengths, but their broadband photoresponse necessitates external spectral filtering for LiDAR operation. In contrast, the tandem device shows a response time of 1.01 ns while retaining an EQE of 25.06% at 1,550 nm and suppressing the visible-band EQE to approximately 7%, highlighting the distinctive combination of speed and intrinsic spectral selectivity.

    Architecture (Material) Response Time (ns) Wavelength (nm) EQE (%) Detectivity (Jones) Ref.
    Tandem (PbSe) 1.01 1,550 7 (Vis)/25 (IR) 2.29 × 1011 1
    Single (PbSe) 1.69 1,550 25.5 — 1
    Single (PbS) 4 1,330 42 3.9 × 1011 2
    Single (PbS) 2 1,330 49 2.6 × 1012 3
    Single (PbS) 7 1,550 70 1.6 × 1012 4
    Single (PbS) 10 1,550 80 8 × 1011 5
    Single (InAs) 10 1,140 75 5 × 1011 6

    Table 1.  Performance comparison of nanosecond-scale SWIR colloidal QD photodiodes.

    Beyond the reported metrics, transitioning from a single-junction architecture to a stacked tandem architecture introduces fundamental shifts in the device physics and manufacturing paradigm. Table 2 outlines the theoretical distinctions and physical trade-offs between these two structural approaches.

    Parameter Single-Junction Architecture Tandem (PIN)2 Architecture
    Theoretical EQE Limit $ \leqslant $ 100% (Fundamental limit without avalanche gain) $ \leqslant $ 50% (Restricted by the series current-matching requirement)
    Response Time Limit ($ \boldsymbol{T} $) $ \boldsymbol{T} $ (Bound by RC delay vs. carrier transit time trade-off) $ \boldsymbol{T}/\mathbf{2} $ (Capacitance halved without extending the sub-cell transit path)
    Noise & Detectivity ($ {\boldsymbol{D}}^{\boldsymbol{*}} $) Lower noise (Minimised active volume restricts bulk thermal generation) Elevated noise (Doubled volume and intermediate layer induce parasitic leakage)
    Ambient Light Immunity Low (Relies on external optical bandpass filters) High (Inherent charge-collection narrowing eliminates mismatched carriers)
    Manufacturing Complexity Low (Standard layer-by-layer solution deposition) High (Requires precise optical matching and ultrathin metal evaporation)

    Table 2.  Fundamental physical and theoretical comparisons between single-junction and tandem photodiode architectures.

    Although conceptually elegant, the tandem architecture inherently caps the theoretical maximum EQE at 50%, necessitating a compromise in absolute sensitivity. Furthermore, transitioning this multilayered design to large-area industrial manufacturing presents a tangible challenge, particularly regarding the 1-nm Au intermediate layer. Depositing such an ultrathin film over rough topographies risks the formation of discontinuous nanoislands, which can introduce parasitic leakage pathways, elevate the noise floor, and complicate scalable fabrication. From a material perspective, a forward-looking approach to overcome the RC limitation involves transitioning to absorbing materials with intrinsically low dielectric constants ($ {\epsilon }_{r} $). For instance, shifting from traditional PbS QDs ($ {\epsilon }_{r}\approx 35 $) to III-V QDs such as InAs QDs ($ {\epsilon }_{r}\approx 6 $) can fundamentally reduce the junction capacitance7. However, surface defects in III–V QDs can introduce mid-gap trap states that promote trap-assisted recombination, thereby degrading the photodiode performance8. Thus, combining low-permittivity materials with robust defect engineering to fabricate high-mobility QD films, together with the tandem architecture, would further reduce both material- and device-level speed limitations. These advances could push QD LiDAR detectors beyond the nanosecond regime while preserving strong ambient-light rejection, thereby opening a new route toward picosecond-scale detection.

Reference (8)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img PowerPoint
    Return
    Return