-
The design of GO lenses in this study originates from detour phase holography28-30, which is a convenient way of controlling light within a single ultrathin interface (Details of the lens design is discussed in Supplementary Materials Note 1). The detour phased planar lens possesses significant axial dispersion properties, thus if the incident wavelength of λ is different from the designed one (λd), shift of the focal length at this wavelength will be:
$$ f = \frac{{{\lambda _d}{f_d}}}{\lambda } $$ (1) When an incident light with a broadband spectrum passing through the lens, the wavelength differences in the spectrum is converted into intensity variations along the optical axis with an inversely proportional dependence on the incident wavelength. Consequently, the intensity distribution along the optical axis is a result of superposition of various wavelength components’ contributions. The strong chromatic dispersion along the axial direction is a prerequisite for spectrum reconstruction using computational methods.
The principle of the spectrum reconstruction is conceptionally illustrated in Fig. 1. When an incident light source with an unknown broadband spectrum (Fig. 1a) passes through the GO lens (Fig. 1b), the axial intensity distributions of the focal fields are dispersed inversely proportional to the incident wavelengths as depicted in Fig. 1c. Subsequently, the incident spectrum and its intensity distribution along the optical axis can be digitally discretized as S(λ) and I(z) with dimensions of m × 1 and n × 1, respectively. The intensity at an arbitrary distance along the optical axis is the summation of the focal fields from various wavelength components:
Fig. 1 The principle of the detour-phased lens-based computational micro-spectrometer. a An unknown incident spectrum that was digitally discretized into m components. b Spectral-to-spatial mapping relations of the detour-phased lens through strong axial chromatic dispersion. c Intensity distribution behind the lens was digitally discretized into n components. d Spectrum reconstruction based on the mapping matrix. e The reconstructed spectrum.
$$ {{\bf I}_j}\left( {\text z} \right) = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^m {{{\bf H}_{j,i}} \cdot {{\bf S}_i}\left( \lambda \right)} $$ (2) where H is the mapping matrix that represents the spectral-to-spatial relationship, and Hj,i represents the calibration coefficient of the ith wavelength component for the jth axial intensity component, as illustrated in Fig. 1d. The reconstruction of the incident spectrum S’(λ) is depicted in Fig. 1c–1e and is calculated by:
$$ {{\rm S}'}\left( \lambda \right) = {{\bf H}^{ - 1}}{\bf I}\left( {\text z} \right) $$ (3) where H−1 is the inverse matrix of H. For a square matrix, H−1 can be directly obtained as long as H is a full rank. Alternatively, if m is not equal to n, H−1 can be obtained by computing the generalized inverse matrix. The calibration coefficient Hj,i is the ratio of the intensity obtained by the detector to the intensity of the incident light with a wavelength of λi, which is invariant for a specific system and can be calibrated in advance using a known spectrum.
There are many advantages combing computational method with detour-phased GO lens. Firstly, all the wavelength-dependent parameters, including transmittance and absorption of GO, diffraction efficiency of the lens, and spectral response of the photodetector, that change the original shape of the incident spectrum during measurement are incorporated into the mapping matrix of H. The axial intensity in the focal region of the lens is the only dataset required in the spectrum reconstruction, which significantly simplifies the spectrum measurement system. Secondly, if the focal fields of two wavelengths are identical, determining which wavelength leads to the intensity pattern is impossible. In other words, two wavelengths are possible to be distinguished provided that differences are present in their focal fields. In this way, dissimilarity between the signature patterns determines the resolving power of the reconstructive spectrometers. As a result, the great dissimilarity of signature patterns resulting from large axial chromatic dispersion allows for high resolving power in spectrum reconstruction. Finally, off-axis aberrations including coma, astigmatism, and lateral chromatic aberration are eliminated along the optical axis, ensuring high-performance focusing at various distances.
-
A detour-phased GO planar lens with a working wavelength of 550 nm, a focal length (f) of 300 μm, and a lens radius (R) of 100 μm was designed. The resulting numerical aperture (NA) is 0.32 according to NA = R∕f. The intensity distribution along the optical axis in the focal region of the planar lens was calculated using the Fresnel scalar diffraction theory (Supplementary Material Note 2)31.
Prior to the reconstruction of the incident spectrum, the micro-spectrometer's mapping matrix H must be calibrated first. The calibration coefficients at the ith column of H were calculated by the ratios of axial intensity distribution I(z) to the intensity Ii(λ) of a single wavelength incident (calibration beam). Fig. 2a shows the axial intensity distributions of various single-wavelength calibration beams incident with a 10 nm interval from 420 nm to 750 nm, and the values along the axial direction representing the distance from the lens plane. As previously stated, the calibration coefficient is invariant for a given system, so the peak intensity of each calibration beam can be set flexibly in the simulation, which was set to 1 for convenience. The focal length variances resulted from the axial chromatic dispersion of the detour-phased planar lens was shown in Fig. 2b. The solid blue is the theoretical prediction according to Eq. 1, and the red squares are calculated based on the Fresnel scalar diffraction theory. The inversely proportional relationship between the focal length and the wavelength perfectly coincides both in theory and simulation. Well-defined 2D focus fields along the axial direction indicate an efficient phase modulation using the detour phase method. Fig. 2c depicts a 2D plot of values of the mapping matrix produced from simulation, which exhibits a similar tendency to that depicted in Fig. 2b because the energy is concentrated around the various focuses.
Fig. 2 Spectrum reconstruction simulations. a Axial intensity distributions of the calibration beam with various wavelengths. b Focal length variations with different wavelengths due to axial chromatic dispersion of the detour-phased planar lens. Solid blue line: theory; red squares: simulation; insert: longitudinal focusing intensity distributions at the wavelengths of 420, 555, and 680 nm. c Surface plot of the mapping matrix. d Spectrum reconstruction accuracy with wavelength intervals from 1 nm to 15 nm. Inset: spectrum reconstruction with a wavelength interval of 5 nm, where solid blue region and red dotted line are the original and reconstructed spectrum, respectively.
An incident beam with a broadband random spectrum (420−750 nm) was used to demonstrate the validity of the spectrum reconstruction method as demonstrated in Fig. 2d. The corresponding axial intensity distribution behind the detour-phased lens was calculated using Fresnel diffraction theory (The intensity pattern is shown in Supplementary Material Fig. S2). Theoretically, when using the computational method, two focal points are supposed to be distinguished as long as the two focal points are not completely overlapped (it is impossible to determine which wavelength leads to the observed pattern if the signature patterns of two distinct wavelengths are identical), which makes it possible to break the diffraction limitations. However, the greater the similarity between the intensity distributions from adjacent wavelengths, the larger the condition number of H, leading to a poorer numerical solution of Eq. 324. As a result, the minimum wavelength interval in spectrum reconstruction is not unlimited. Here, spectrum reconstruction accuracy (ratio of the accurately retrieved points) at various wavelength intervals are investigated, and the results are shown in Fig. 2d. When the wavelength interval is larger than 5 nm, the incident spectrum can be completely reconstructed (spectrum reconstruction at an interval of 10 nm is present in Supplementary Fig. S3). However, when the wavelength interval becomes 4 nm, the reconstruction accuracy decreases to about 42%, and decrease continuously as the wavelength interval reducing. As a result, the spacing of the discretization wavelength should be selected carefully to maximize the potential of the system. Nevertheless, an incident spectrum can be accurately retrieved at a wavelength interval of 5 nm. Without using the computational method, the resolvable wavelength is limited by the Rayleigh criterion, which in this regime is 24.75 nm (The resolving power compared with the traditional method is discussed in Supplementary Materials Note 3). The result achieved by computational method is a 5-time improvement over the traditional approach without using the computational methods.
Ultracompact computational spectroscopy with a detour-phased planar lens
- Light: Advanced Manufacturing , Article number: (2024)
- Received: 26 January 2024
- Revised: 06 August 2024
- Accepted: 09 August 2024 Published online: 30 September 2024
doi: https://doi.org/10.37188/lam.2024.044
Abstract: Compact micro-spectrometers have gained significant attention due to their ease of integration and real-time spectrum measurement capabilities. However, size reduction often compromises performance, particularly in resolution and measurable wavelength range. This work proposes a computational micro-spectrometer based on an ultra-thin (~250 nm) detour-phased graphene oxide planar lens with a sub-millimeter footprint, utilizing a spectral-to-spatial mapping method. The varying intensity pattern along the focal axis of the lens acts as a measurement signal, simplifying the system and enabling real-time spectrum acquisition. Combined with computational retrieval method, an input spectrum is reconstructed with a wavelength interval down to 5 nm, representing a 5-time improvement compared with the result when not using computational method. In an optical compartment of 200 μm by 200 μm by 450 μm from lens profile to the detector surface, the ultracompact spectrometer achieves broad spectrum measurement covering the visible range (420−750 nm) with a wavelength interval of 15 nm. Our compact computational micro-spectrometer paves the way for integration into portable, handheld, and wearable devices, holding promise for diverse real-time applications like in-situ health monitoring (e.g., tracking blood glucose levels), food quality assessment, and portable counterfeit detection.
Research Summary
Micro-spectrometers: Miniaturized footprint with Improved Resolution Aided by Computational Spectroscopy
Optical spectrometers are powerful instruments utilized to decompose complex optical spectra and quantify the intensity of their various wavelength components. Traditional spectrometers often tend to be cumbersome, which is contrary to the need for portable and handheld spectral analysis devices, such as lab-on-chip systems, smartphones. However, size reduction often compromises performance, particularly in resolution and measurable wavelength range. This work proposes a computational micro-spectrometer based on an ultra-thin (~250 nm) planar lens with a sub-millimeter footprint. Combined with computational retrieval method, an input spectrum is reconstructed with a wavelength interval down to 5 nm covering the visible range, representing a 5-time improvement to the traditional method with the same structure. The compact computational micro-spectrometer holds promise in diverse real-time applications like in-situ health monitoring, food quality assessment, and portable counterfeit detection.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article′s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article′s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.